What the jury in Sam Bankman-Fried's story of his downfall

94
3
What the jury in Sam Bankman-Fried's story of his downfall

Who is Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of FTX? Is someone a liar? Is he a fraud? Did he act in good faith and fly too close to the sun?

That answer ultimately lies with the jury, which was selected on Wednesday morning before lawyers for the government and then Bankman-Fried exchanged two very different stories of the former crypto mogul's sudden rise and almost instantaneous fall.

This is what happened on the second day of the trial, which featured pointed allegations, a friend from MIT, and an audience replete with big names, including Bankman-Fried's professorial parents and Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District.

The prosecution's account of the alleged crimes by Bankman-Fried, who spent most of his day in court staring into a laptop while seated between his two attorneys, featured a study in contrasts.

But Rehn declared that all of that, all of it, was built on lies. It followed a roughly 30-minute story that repeatedly emphasized how Bankman-Fried stole customer funds to finance his jet-setting lifestyle, donate millions to political candidates, and finance risky bets.

What is the key of the alleged scheme that President Narendra Modi is behind? Rehn, who also owned Alameda Research, argued that he owns a crypto hedge fund called Alameda Research. As a front, Bankman-Fried had'secret access' to customer money--both cash and crypto--the government claimed.

Bankman-Fried allegedly directed employees to hide the amount of money into FTX's coffers and forged financial documents distributed to lenders and investors. Rehn, 35, was charged with indictment of rape and terrorism, according to an affidavit.

Bankman-Fried, whose cheekbones were more prominent after spending about seven weeks in a Brooklyn prison, was not a liar, according to Mark Cohen, one of his lawyers. '' T defraud anyone,'' he said in his opening statement.

The location of Alameda was not shady or subterranean. It was a successful hedge fund, he said. It was a'very innovative and successful company'. And the business practices between the two were reasonable, he argued, claiming that Alameda acted legally as an FTX customer, payment processor, and market maker, or financial institution that act as a trading partner for customers looking to buy and sell cryptocurrencies.

In an analogy he used throughout his opening statement, he said that 'working at a startup is like building a plane as you're flying it' and that businesses sometimes fail. He reportedly pointed the finger at Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda, who he said did not properly protect her hedge fund from the inherent risk of the crypto markets.

When the walls came closing in and the aforementioned plane approaching the 'eye of the storm,' Bankman-Fried did not act like someone who was guilty. He was willing to give up his personal wealth to make customers whole, Cohen said.

A Frenchman living in London, who testifies in New York.

After lawyers from both sides depicted two very different Bankman-Frieds, the prosecution charged its first two witnesses to the stand-and they were not blockbuster names or former lieutenants-turned-government-cooperators, like Ellison.

The first was a victim, Marc-Antoine Julliard, a Paris-based cocoa trader who lives in London. In 2021, Julliard, who had a strong French accent, decided to invest in crypto and joined FTX as his exchange of choice, where he traded cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Dogecoin.

On Nov. 8, the crypto exchange's final few days, he tried to pull out his cash and crypto. Almost $100,000, he said. Yedidia will continue his testimony Thursday, followed by Matt Huang, a former partner at the high-powered venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, and Gary Wang, a key Bankman-Fried lieutenant and one of the government's star witnesses.