Plans for Stronger Sanctions on Train-Protest Blocking Draw Criticism

60
2
Plans for Stronger Sanctions on Train-Protest Blocking Draw Criticism

Plans to implement tougher measures against protests that interfere with train services have been met with opposition from environmental activists, who argue that such actions would infringe upon free speech rights. The state government is preparing to introduce new legislation that would broaden the scope of existing laws prohibiting demonstrators from obstructing roads, bridges, and ports to include railway lines as well.

The push for these stronger sanctions comes in response to incidents where environmental activists halted a coal train near Newcastle in protest against coal mine expansions approved by the federal government in NSW. Activists, predominantly from Blockade Australia, have been known to block railway lines leading to the Port of Newcastle, a major coal port, in recent years. NSW Premier Chris Minns has expressed concerns over the disruptions caused by protests on railway corridors, pointing out the potential economic damage and safety risks involved.

Protesters disrupting major roadways, bridges, tunnels, public transport, and infrastructure facilities have already been subject to legislation passed in 2022 to curb such actions. Attorney General Michael Daley argues that these laws aim to deter unacceptable behavior rather than restrict the right to peaceful protest. However, activists like Rising Tide's spokesperson Briohny Coglin believe that proposed fines may not deter passionate individuals willing to take a stand, as they are already aware of potential consequences like imprisonment.

Groups like Blockade Australia refute safety concerns raised by officials, stating that they have a history of blockading coal trains to the Port of Newcastle without any serious incidents. They claim that safety is being used as a pretext to suppress protests. The NSW Greens have strongly criticized the legislation, labeling it as an assault on the right to protest and a means to stifle dissent regarding climate change policies. Meanwhile, the Minerals Council supports the crackdown on protests near rail corridors, emphasizing the importance of conducting demonstrations safely and legally without causing excessive disruptions to communities or industries.