Critics slam Pakistan government for passing amendments to cybercrime law without consultation

55
2
Critics slam Pakistan government for passing amendments to cybercrime law without consultation

The recent move by the Pakistan government to pass amendments to the cybercrime law has sparked significant criticism from various quarters. Journalists, human rights organizations, and even the PPP's human rights cell have raised concerns over the lack of consultation with stakeholders in the decision-making process. This has led to accusations that the amendments curtail freedom of expression and criminalize dissent, with specific focus on not just social media but also electronic and print media's digital platforms.

A joint statement issued by a coalition of journalists and media bodies has vowed to challenge the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act in court and initiate a protest movement against the government's actions. The Joint Action Committee, comprising organizations like PFUJ, PBA, AEMEND, APNS, and CPNE, has accused the federal government of breaching promises by passing the contentious bill without engaging with any of the concerned parties. They have highlighted the intention of the bill to criminalize dissenting opinions, emphasizing the need for the government to postpone Senate ratification of the law and engage in meaningful dialogue with all stakeholders.

Global Network Initiative's executive director, Jason Pielemeier, has called for a reevaluation of the government's approach, urging for open and transparent consultations with multiple stakeholders on the rule. Expressing concerns over potential impacts on freedom of opinion, expression, and the press in Pakistan, the statement noted the inclusion of terms like "fake or false information" and "aspersion" against constitutional institutions and their officers in the enlarged definition of unlawful content. Furthermore, reminders of Pakistan's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights have been made, emphasizing the need for meaningful dialogue and transparent public consultations on the issue.